Services / Quality
QA at 11Seas is not a gate at the end of a project. Testing runs inside every sprint, so defects surface while the code is fresh and cheap to fix rather than during a tense pre-launch week.
We combine automated coverage on critical paths with structured manual testing where human judgment matters — usability, edge cases, and the things automation reliably misses.
“Why do bugs keep reaching production?”
Almost always because testing was scheduled as a phase instead of a habit. When QA participates from sprint one, defects get caught at the point they're introduced — when a fix takes minutes rather than a coordinated hotfix.
QA at 11Seas is not a gate at the end of a project. Testing runs inside every sprint, so defects surface while the code is fresh and cheap to fix rather than…
We define what to test, at what level, and how much is enough — a proportionate plan rather than a generic checklist applied to every project. This covers risk-based prioritization of what gets automated first, the balance between unit, integration, and end-to-end coverage, and how code quality gates fit into your CI/CD pipeline so nothing ships without a passing suite.
Automation where it earns its keep: regression suites that run on every commit and catch breakage before a human ever sees it.
Structured exploratory sessions on real devices, covering usability, unusual states, and the combinations no one wrote a ticket for.
Load and stress testing against realistic traffic, plus security review covering the OWASP basics — authentication, authorization, injection, and data exposure.
We define what to test, at what level, and how much is enough — a proportionate plan rather than a generic checklist applied to…
Automation where it earns its keep: regression suites that run on every commit and catch breakage before a human ever sees…
Structured exploratory sessions on real devices, covering usability, unusual states, and the combinations no one wrote a ticket…
Load and stress testing against realistic traffic, plus security review covering the OWASP basics — authentication,…
Everything below is in scope for a typical engagement — we scope precisely against your situation before quoting.
Test artifacts, automation suites, and reports remain yours and stay in your repositories.
Assurance
Layered automated and exploratory testing that catches regressions while they are still cheap to fix.
Yes. We regularly provide QA for products built by other teams, whether as an ongoing function or a one-off release audit.
Playwright and Cypress for end-to-end, Jest and Vitest for JavaScript unit tests, PyTest for Python, and XCTest and Espresso for native mobile.
It depends on stability. Mature, high-traffic paths deserve heavy automation. Rapidly changing features are usually cheaper to test manually until they settle.
Yes — a physical device lab for the most common configurations, supplemented by cloud device farms for wider OS and model coverage.
We do this often: establishing test strategy, tooling, and workflow, then training your team to run it independently.
We flag severity immediately with reproduction steps and impact assessment, then work with you on the call — fix and hold, or ship with a known limitation and a scheduled patch.
QA services cover test strategy, automation, and performance and security testing, built into every development sprint rather than added right before release.
Both. Automated testing covers repetitive regression checks efficiently, while manual QA passes catch usability and edge-case issues automation tends to miss.
Yes. We review the existing codebase and test coverage first, then build a QA strategy that fits what's already there rather than starting from scratch unnecessarily.
Every defect caught in a sprint costs a fraction of one found in production — no emergency release, no support backlog, no eroded trust. That economic reality is why QA is built into how we work rather than sold as an…
Get clarity on your idea, scope, and next steps — in one short call.
